Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (5)

normj avatar normj commented on June 24, 2024

Thanks for letting us know about your performance issue. I'm doing some investigation into this and let you know what I find.

from aws-sdk-net.

normj avatar normj commented on June 24, 2024

Hi Crypth

I wanted to give you an update on this performance issue. I'm still investigating the performance differences between V1 and V2 and have made good progress. I want to do a bit more performance tuning and testing on my fixes before releasing the changes.

from aws-sdk-net.

Crypth avatar Crypth commented on June 24, 2024

That is splendid news 👍 , I'm just sorry I don't have the time to help out. Out of curiosity though, where was the bottleneck? Or perhaps have the release notes disclose it instead of wasting time on comments here is a better idea.

from aws-sdk-net.

normj avatar normj commented on June 24, 2024

We released version 2.0.4 of the SDK recently that contains performance improvements. I'd appreciate it if you could download it and see what improvements you see.

There wasn't any one thing causing the performance bottleneck. We switched to a new Json parser for V2 and we needed to rework how we were using it.

from aws-sdk-net.

Crypth avatar Crypth commented on June 24, 2024

Cheers Normj, I've checked the performance, not quite as thoroughly as i have time for at the moment but it seems it's quite an improvement. A quick test with 30k items or so was 12 seconds with the 2.0.4.1 SDK while my slightly modified 1.5.37.0 ran at 7.5 seconds. This makes sense though as I've implemented gzip in my version which shaves off quite a bit of time from the response. In fact the rework in 2.0.4.1 might even be faster. As far as I'm concerned this issue is resolved, many thanks. I'll let you know more when I've stuck gzip support into the 2.0.4.1 if you'd like.

I'm not sharing that code unless someone asks for it because of the implementation it needs to check the checksum for both data streams, thus making it slightly unsafe. Unless we can somehow learn the size of when the dynamodb server starts gzipping the response, i can't think of any better way though.

from aws-sdk-net.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.