Autotools build improvement about avrdude HOT 6 OPEN

@mcuee Thanks for proactively starting issues on things we'd like improved. Can we please use fewer issues: we can summarise what needs improved, eg, have one issue for improving autotools build (listing the 4 aspects to improve) and one issue for improving documentation. It is unlikely we attract a number of people working in parallel on these issues (and for the autotools this is definitely not advisable). Also the new issue on jtag2updi improvement is kinda non-descript. I'd remove that for the time being or make it specific.

Ideally we never grow over a page of issues and discussions so we don't lose sight over things on the second page

from avrdude.

@stefanrueger

Done.

from avrdude.

@stefanrueger

I have trimmed down the number of issues and discussions to one page. Feel free to close those issues/discussions you think can be closed.

from avrdude.

@mcuee
Brilliant, thank you!

from avrdude.

The following issue should be present in autotools build as well.

• #1683

from avrdude.

The following issue should be present in autotools build as well.

* [avrintel.h missing from installation #1683](https://github.com/avrdudes/avrdude/issues/1683)

I will reflect in autoconf whatever comes out of the discussion over there.

from avrdude.