autopep8 conflict with multi-line context manager about add-trailing-comma HOT 3 CLOSED

This problem is rooted in pycodestyle:

test.py:6:5: E125 continuation line with same indent as next logical line

honestly there's no "nice" formatting of these continued with statements that appeases both tools :/

I don't think there's anything that can be done here from the add-trailing-comma side -- the code probably just needs to have manual human rewriting:

two withs

with b(c):
    with d(e):
        # ...

not-so-great implicit continuation

with b(
    c,
), d(
    e,
):
    # ...

with b(c), d(
    e,
):
    # ...

I really just wish python let you do something like

with (
    b(c),
    d(e),
):

from add-trailing-comma.

Since I don't think there's anything actionable here (other than for the human to pick a different syntax approach that isn't ugly) I'm going to close this. It's good documentation for resolving these conflicts manually though so I'm going to keep documenting these and tagging them with [autopep8]

from add-trailing-comma.

Here another alternative that makes autopep8 and add-trailing-comma happy (if it fits into one line):

def a():
    with b(c), d(e):
        pass

(Comma behind c and/or e optional)

from add-trailing-comma.