Define Web API (for CRUD) about new-yorken-poesry-magazine HOT 2 CLOSED

One of my biggest questions here is whether it is a good idea to allow for algorithmic transparency-- i.e. should the submitted code/binaries be available for anyone to download?

@cfinucane @atmalagon, i'd be interested in what y'all think.

I am initially thinking that transparency is a positive thing so maybe people can learn how other's have developed their algorithms (though since algorithmic diversity is a key tenet of our philosophy, maybe algorithmic opaqueness is more conducive to diversity...?). Thoughts?

from new-yorken-poesry-magazine.

I was talking to Noah about algorithmic transparency and he brought up a really interesting point -- if the ai wants to game the system and submit things that the current committee would like (ie, analogy to human life, a person submitting to a magazine knows what the editor likes and modifies their work accordingly), having the committee's evaluation metrics be readable would make that more possible. also, do ai get rejection slips if they don't win?

from new-yorken-poesry-magazine.