just-camel-case not a drop-in replacement for lodash.camelcase about just HOT 2 CLOSED

[email protected] fixes these issues. I've dropped the strict option requirement and it now gives very similar results to lodash and passes your tests.

Let me know if I missed anything.

from just.

Many thanks for your observations and feedback Grady. Yeah, I made those decisions consciously, knowing that they differ from lodash etc., but believing that was a more accurate interpretation of the camel case definitions I could find.

However I think you're probably right, it would be more practical to make it behave more like lodash etc. as this has become the de facto standard.

Thanks for your suggestion, I'll use it as the basis for a 'fix' (that will become a new major version) and I think I will get rid of the strict option.

I'm a bit under the weather at the moment, but when I'm ready I plan to use you suggestions but with a few changes

1. try to include non-english characters in the camel case and splitter regex
2. change the camel case tester to expect a lower case letter at the start
3. try to make to code more compact for minimal bytes.

Feel free to put up a PR if you get to it first
Thanks again!

from just.