printf style format specifier %f about pdfgen HOT 3 CLOSED

Thanks for the feedback - sounds like a difficult environment to port software to :)

Regarding %g, I think making that change might result in scientific notation output (ie: 3.9265e+2), which I don't think is valid for a PDF. I don't think printf has a precision specifier for %f to tell it to strip trailing zeros unfortunately. Without putting our own special formatter in for this, there doesn't seem to be an easy way to get the desired output.

In general the PDFGen output is not super size optimised, it's more about simplicity & readability (although obviously dropping trailing zeros would benefit both of those if it were easy to implement)

from pdfgen.

Thanks Andre. Good point about the possibility of scientific notation in the output. We wouldn't want that in a PDF document. I'm guessing a better solution would be to use a PDF specific formatting routine that could format a floating point number with %f and remove any trailing zeros. I'll have to give that some more thought.

I have to wonder if there will be edge cases in which the use of %g would actually format a float with scientific output for a PDF document. I don't really know, so I have to admit the use of %g would not be the safest thing as different implementations of the standard C library functions could cause it to not work, that is not have scientific notation, in all cases.

Thanks again. I appreciate the feedback. Best Wishes.
--Mike

from pdfgen.

I'll close this for now then, since it doesn't look like %g is going to work in all cases. Let me know if you want to reopen it or have some other thoughts on the matter.

from pdfgen.