Extensible Functions about pql HOT 3 CLOSED

1. I'll do it.
2. Could you do it by passing in a defaultdict?
3. I'll think about this when I get back from vacation.
   I'll also add support for epochs (not sure about the dateutil format though, will have to see which timestamp format feels better)

Thanks for the ideas!

from pql.

1. Excellent!
2. I don't believe this will work because resolve_field in SchemaAwareOperatorMap checks to see if the field is in the map with "in". Also, I am using python 2.6 (shame on me).
3. The dateutil parser parses a bunch of various string date formats. Very similar to what you have done with your date parser. I was just lazy, I haven't compared the two.

If you would like me to work on a patch for anything let me know. I'd be glad to help out.

Cheers,
Lew

P.S. Enjoy your vacation!

from pql.

I ended up doing the following:

1. 'find' is just a shortcut for the trivial use cases. perhaps advanced users should use parsers themselves. I kinda prefer leaving it like it, not sure.
2. It now does a getitem so defaultdict will work
3. replaced to dateutil and added your epoch field.

Thanks again!

from pql.