Section SecurityRequirements is missing about azurefunctions.extensions HOT 6 CLOSED

@tjgalama Thanks for the issue! I'll have a look.

from azurefunctions.extensions.

Ahum, Although it would be nice to have _document.SecurityRequirements somehow extendable, I noticed that my fix to add all scheme's by default, is not always preferred.
In my case it was even better to add the referenced security scheme's to the Security property of the individual OpenApiOperation objects.

from azurefunctions.extensions.

@tjgalama The security scheme appears on both operation level and root level.

If I understand your issue correctly, originally you prefer putting the security scheme at the root level, but then suggested to put it on the operation level. Is that correct?

And I think, if we implement, this scheme should appear on both levels – one for host key and the other for function key. How does this sound?

from azurefunctions.extensions.

I'm not sure how you'd put it at the operation level, it's not spelled out in the docs. I've been banging my head at this issue all day, and the fix from @tjgalama saved me a few more hours of work. Thanks!

from azurefunctions.extensions.

I needed to add 'x-functions-key' in the root level @tjgalama 's solution solves my problem and saves my day. It would be more convenient if the Document class is extensible.

from azurefunctions.extensions.

It's implemented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-openapi-extension Please check this repo for future update

from azurefunctions.extensions.