Opinion on class names about adessokicker HOT 2 CLOSED

I've already read the book a few days ago aswell as @czarnecki. We already did some kind of refactoring Issue#72 based on Java By Comparison. Those classes are named like that because they represent entities for JPA/Hibernate. The Book also mentioned that every public class should contain a comment do describe the usage for this class. But I agree that our services should be named more active, not passive like your example.

from adessokicker.

Yes, we should add some JavaDos at least for the class explanation.
Like Cem said the word request describes what kind of entiy the class is so we shouldn't change it.
I think it is important to to have short names for the classes. But I also think it is even more important to give names, that are complete self explaining. verifyMatch would not express what kind of object the class is about.

from adessokicker.